cfe223 vs h335 No Further a Mystery
cfe223 vs h335 No Further a Mystery
Blog Article
Some will counsel that by using a ball powder You will need a magnum primer or mil spec primer. That is just an outdated wives tale!
It had been a lengthy Winter season, which has a hand drill plus the primer pocket Software I used to be capable to get rid of the crimp from 2000+ military situations. I will by no means try this once more but I need to be set for life with instances now which has a number of thousand .223 in addition.
This is certainly why I do not buy off manufacturer bargain bullets, and why I do not buy bullets from brands that do not offer data or not less than info and rules like Xtreme does.
I like H335. It presents me superior groups in my 222 and 22-250 than H4895. It does throw some hearth out though. It can be an incredibly functional powder IMO. I haven't noticed it becoming dirty but I clean up my guns very often.
My load with Hornady fifty five-gr bullets was high-quality, but his While using the Noslers (in a very Rem seven-hundred VS) wasn't. Incredibly hot temps + a bullet that tends to generate more stress + different rifle. Backing off not less than 0.5 to 25.five or significantly less would solve his tension troubles. In the case of an individual employing Federal .223 Rem brass that's been noted for resulting in strain problems as a consequence of It truly is thicker partitions and thinner web area, a reduced load is surely recommended. This is often why some posters have unique final results with loads that are merely great for others. Many handloaders who may have no means of chronographing their do the job-ups as a method of obtaining a handle on pressure in their guns with their factors. When tension signs seem within the brass and/or primer, then regretably abnormal pressure is now existing. Keeping track of the chronograph average velocities lets you realize when envisioned optimum velocity has long been reached. In such a case it would be in the area of 3107 fps for those who typical out all 5 sources. As a result backing off a tiny bit will Ordinarily steer clear of this and is particularly applying excellent feeling. A single great way of acquiring a good deal with on what your limits must be is always to typical data from all of the resources you can get. In such cases, averaging all five resources offers an average greatest charge body weight of 25 grains at 3107 fps. In case you have been to throw out the "odd" greatest demand pounds of Hornady plus the "odd" lower velocity of Sierra you should get this regular: 25.5 grains at 3134 fps - which I feel might be a little a lot more reasonable figures for barrels from the 20-22" range from what I've viewed. That is certainly why I like to consult as several data resources as you can ahead of environment plans for a load function-up. In addition, 1 really should exploration and see When the picked parts can include to pressure (Federal .223 brass, Nosler Ballistic Suggestions, M193 bullets and so on.) Of course this discussion just isn't about discovering your "precision node" but just demand/force/velocity ambitions or ceilings. On the other hand in my circumstance, accuracy appears to be to enhance with raises in demand pounds when loading H-335. Begin loads like 23 to 25 grains are only so-so, but loads like twenty five.five are Excellent for me. I believe that the bullet made use of makes a bigger variance in comparison to the charge bodyweight. *While some Be aware that 26.0 grains is a "5.56 NATO-stress" load - in this individual situation it is clear that true five.56 NATO-force ammo - LC M193 essentially is much hotter and 90 fps speedier In this particular certain AR15. This could certainly only be proven with the chronograph or maybe a force barrel.
Should I give away the power to some buddy that might get some decent use outside of it, or keep onto it just in case I get An additional gun Which may do nicely with it?
H335 is a detailed next, but I've been Performing up loads with Benchmark and Hornady 55gr bullets and CCI 450 primers lately, they appear to be Doing the job perfect for precise plinking.
.223 has such a mixture of headstamp origins that some professional has fewer potential than some NATO and vice versa. Regardless of whether some instances are about the small side of circumstance volumes, the charge can also be within the lower facet for H335.
This really is an older thread, you might not get a reaction, and could be reviving an old thread. Be sure to take into consideration developing a new thread.
I examine it someplace on that web site with regards to the TTSX and XTB. I haven't discovered any CFE-223 data any where else. I are going to be happy if the data can make it to the paper manuals!
We use cookies to generate your experience better. To adjust to the new e-Privateness directive, we must talk to for your consent to set the cookies.
I am holding out until charges appear down or inventory results in being abundant. I need not spend these panic price ranges. Enroll in e-mail notifications.
Quoted: H-335 is often a typical .223 Rem powder and was oft encouraged by ballistician Ed Matunas who did a number of reloading manuals being a powder that shot perfectly check here in many different rifles. Originally a military services surplus powder, now it is freshly-created for Hodgdon. Moreover, as it is actually a ball powder, it meters significantly better than long-grain IMR 3031.
I’ve go through fantastic items about tac although. I’ve read it’s much better for lighter bullets? What’s your dude’s load data for tac plus the 55gr’er. Many thanks and sorry, I really feel like I put up a great deal lol You might be MY ONLY FRIENDS